Dutch bank ING: Campaigners to call for coal finance cuts at AGM

Energy transition| Financing the transition

At its 2017 Annual General Meeting on Monday 8 May, the biggest Dutch bank ING will face calls from European campaigners to end its financial support to companies building or planning new coal mines and coal-fired power plants.

Despite its 2015 commitment to restrict its coal financing in line with the 1.5C target, the AGM in Amsterdam will discuss ING’s financial support, via loans and bond issues, to companies planning huge new coal infrastructure projects in Poland (PGE and ENEA) and Turkey (EÜAŞ), two key European coal hotspots in which the struggling industry is desperately putting up a last stand.
ING’s multi million euro project finance for the Cirebon 2 (Indonesia) and Punta Catalina (Dominican Republic) coal power plants, both currently mired in controversy over illegal environmental permitting and corrupt contract tendering, will also be raised with ING’s board.

Kuba Gogolewski, a finance campaigner at Polish NGO “Development YES – Open-pit Mines NO” attending the ING AGM, said:
“It’s not a question of if but rather when young people from Poland or Turkey will start taking ING and other banks financing new coal power plants and mines to court. The climate science is conclusive and the atmosphere does not distinguish between greenhouse gas emissions from a new or old ING client.”
“Either ING decides to stop doing business with companies such as PGE and ENEA which are building and planning coal expansion in Poland, or the bank will be ordered to do so just as the Dutch government has been.”

In spite of a coal finance policy which introduced, as of November 2015, certain restrictions on ING’s direct investments in coal mining and power globally, the bank is still able to lend to those coal clients it had on its books before the current policy emerged, as it has done for example with Russia’s top coal producer SUEK.
Campaigners will call on ING to end such direct coal financing, and to no longer issue bonds or general corporate finance to companies planning new coal mine or power projects.

Johan Frijns, director of BankTrack, said:
“ING’s coal policy was certainly a step in the right direction right before the Paris climate summit, clearly raising the bar for other banks to take meaningful steps forward and tackle climate change. Unfortunately, since then, we’ve seen too many of the policy’s pro-coal and anti-climate limitations reflected in persistent ING coal financing.”
“The Paris Agreement is now in force, and much more determination to stamp out all the various financial avenues which the coal industry relies on is now needed from ING if it really wants to help ensure the achievement of the Paris goals.”

Wendel Trio, director of Climate Action Network Europe, said:
“ING came out as one of the first major European banks to change its finance policy so as to be part of the solution. Yet, the bank continues to give substantial financial support to Turkish and Polish coal companies that both delve and burn more coal, to the detriment of our planet. It is time for ING to walk the talk, stop financing Europe’s ticking climate bombs and stick to its Paris pledge to restrict its coal financing in line with the 1.5°C target.”



Kuba Gogolewski, Private Finance Campaigner, Foundation “Development YES – Open-pit Mines NO”, + 48 661 862 611, k.gogolewski@fundacja.rt-on.pl
Diana Maciąga, Climate Coordinator, Association Workshop for All Beings, +48 502 646 890, diana@pracownia.org.pl
Nicolas Derobert, CAN Europe Communications Coordinator, +32 483 62 18 88, nicolas@caneurope.org


Visit the ING AGM page link
Read our briefing paper


Press release

Leading Environment and Climate Organisations Score European Parliament’s 2019-2024 Performance ​

New in-depth data research from five leading climate and environment organisations reveals that only a minority of MEPs during the 2019 – 2024 mandate acted to protect Europe’s climate, nature and air quality. The majority of MEPs acted instead as either procrastinators or prehistoric thinkers, delaying real action with patchy and inconsistent voting records, or worse, completely failing to rise to the challenge of the crises Europe is facing.

Read More »