Stop the expansion of fossil gas infrastructure

Energy transition

LETTER

TO: Energy Minister from CEE and island countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Greece, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Romania and Slovakia)

SUBJECT: Concerning fossil gas in the revised TEN-E Regulation

 

We write to express our concerns regarding proposal for the reintroduction of fossil gas in the revised trans-European infrastructure energy (TEN-E) regulation. The European Union and the TEN-E must not facilitate investments in fossil fuel infrastructure. We write ahead of the next EU Council meeting on 11 June, to urge you to act now to prevent the waste of public money on the expansion of the costly and already partly underutilized fossil gas infrastructure.

Fossil gas expansion, through the so-called Projects of Common Interest, or PCIs, that have privileged access to construction permits and public financing, stands in stark contrast to the urgent need to radically reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.

Fossil gas is a fossil fuel with catastrophic climate impacts, and not just due to its carbon dioxide emissions released during burning. It contributes to global warming before ever reaching the point of combustion. Methane emissions from fossil gas leak unburned at every stage from extraction to consumer, in sufficient quantities to make it an enormous climate danger. While methane stays in the atmosphere for a shorter period than carbon dioxide, methane warms the planet by 86 times as much as carbon dioxide because of its higher potential to store heat, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. There is strong evidence that when the full life cycle is taken into account, fossil gas can have the same or even worse climate impact as other fossil fuels.

According to a recent UN report, global methane emissions have continued to rise despite the recent economic turmoil, while cutting methane is the strongest lever and an urgent need if we are to slow climate change. Following the report, UN chief, António Guterres, pleaded with world leaders to transition away from fossil fuels if we are to avoid falling into a climate abyss.

According to the International Energy Agency report, there is no space left for the expansion of fossil infrastructure in the world. “The analysis reviewed all current and under-construction energy infrastructure around the world – and finds they will account for some 95% of all emissions permitted under international climate targets in coming decades.”

Furthermore, according to the European Commission, EU fossil gas consumption needs to decline considerably in the next decade, by 36% in comparison to the 2015 level, if the EU is to achieve its climate commitments.

Just like in the rest of Europe, security of supply does not necessitate further expansion of costly fossil gas infrastructure in central and eastern Europe. Assessments of existing fossil gas infrastructure in Europe showed that the current network is sufficiently resilient to meet a variety of future gas demand scenarios in the EU, even in the event of extreme supply disruption cases.

A recent report by Global Energy Monitor has revealed that planned public and private investments, worth 87 billion euros, would see the EU’s fossil gas import capacity actually increase by 35%, leading inevitably to stranded assets, to be borne by consumers.

In fact, even according to the latest EU expert agency opinion, investing now into new gas infrastructure risks creating many stranded assets because there is the lack of commitments from potential pipeline users to use these capacity increases.

It has to be noted that even the current import capacity is underused. For example LNG terminals have been used to a less than to one half of their capacity (average utilisation rate of 46% for 2019 and 2020) according to the Food & Water report.

Spending taxpayer money now on fossil gas infrastructure necessarily means diverting investment from much-needed demand-side energy efficiency projects and fast deployment of sustainable forms of renewable energy.

Creating a renewables-powered energy system in Europe should not be reserved only for rich countries. No Europeans should be left behind in the EU’s transition to a zero-carbon energy system. A secure and job-rich future can be ours – if we have the courage to grasp it.

We urge you to support measures that genuinely bring forward a just and swift energy transition aligned with the Paris Climate Agreement. We call on you to vote against the inclusion of fossil gas infrastructure into the revised TEN-E regulation.

Sincerely,
1. CEE Bankwatch Network,
2. Priatelia Zeme – CEPA, Slovakia
3. Extinction Rebellion, Slovakia
4. Spoločnosť ochrany spotrebiteľov (S.O.S.), Slovakia
5. Za Zemiata, Bulgaria
6. CEPTA – Centre for sustainable alternatives, Slovakia
7. Terra Hub, Croatia
8. Association Žmergo, Croatia
9. NGO ”Eko-Zadar’, Croatia
10. Friends of the Earth Cyprus, Cyprus
11. The Alliance of the Associations Polish Green Network, Poland
12. Institute for Political Ecology, Croatia
13. Stowarzyszenie Ekologiczne EKO-UNIA, Poland
14. Děti Země, Czech Republic
15. The Climate Collective, Greece
16. Pan, udruga za zaštitu okoliša i prirode, Croatia
17. WWF Adria, Croatia
18. Avli, Cyprus
19. ARION-Cetacean Rescue and Rehabilitation Research Center, Greece
20. Greenpeace Greece, Greece
21. Bankwatch Romania, Romania
22. Naturefriends Greece, Greece
23. Clean Air Action Group, Hungary
24. Energiaklub Climate Policy Institute and Applied Communication, Hungary
25. National Society of Conservationists – Friends of the Earth Hungary
26. NESEHNUTÍ, Czech Republic
27. TERRA CYPRIA, Cyprus
28. Re-set: platform for social-ecological transformation, Czech Republic
29. The Green Tank, Greece
30. Centre for Transport and Energy, Czech Republic
31. Green Policy Institute, Bulgaria
32. WWF Greece, Greece
33. Brod Ecological Society-BED, Croatia
34. Mediterranean Institute for Nature and Anthropos, Greece
35. Society for sustainable development design, Croatia
36. CALLISTO, Wildlife and Nature Conservation Society, Greece
37. Ecological Institute Veronica, Czech Republic
38. ΤΟΥΛΙΠΑ ΓΟΥΛΙΜΗ, Greece
39. Hellenic Society for the Protection of Nature, Greece
40. Eko-Eko, Croatia
41. Scientists for Climate – Croatia, Croatia
42. ΔΡΑΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΓΡΙΑ ΖΩΗ, Greece
43. MEDASSET, Greece
44. Zelena akcija/Friends of the Earth Croatia, Croatia
45. Stowarzyszenie Pracownia na rzecz Wszystkich Istot, Poland
46. Zielony Instytut, Poland
47. Polish Ecological Club Mazovian Branch, Poland
48. Society for the Earth, Poland
49. 2 Celsius Association, Romania
50. WWF Romania, Romania
51. Declic, Romania
52. Fundacja Instytut na rzecz Ekorozwoju, Poland
53. Znepokojené Matky, Slovakia
54. Friends of the Earth Malta, Malta

RELATED NEWS_

Policy Briefing

Letter to the EU Heads of States and Governments: The Clean Industrial Deal & Competitiveness

We are writing ahead of the European Council 17-18 October meeting, in which the EU’s competitiveness agenda will be discussed.
In light of the forthcoming ‘Clean Industrial Deal’ (CID), the best way to preserve the EU’s long-term competitiveness is an EU green industrial strategy centred around the European Green Deal and its targets, which stimulates the production of net-zero technologies, ends our fossil fuel dependence and reduces our energy and material demand.

Read More »
Skip to content