Future EU investment package falls short of climate ambition

Financing the transition

Today the European Parliament took a disappointing stance on climate when voting to approve the establishment of InvestEU, the EU’s financing tool to attract private investments – say NGO groups CEE Bankwatch Network, Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, WWF European Policy Office, and Counter Balance. The approved investment package keeps the door open to further public investments in fossil fuels, which is incompatible with the requirements of the Paris Agreement.

Today the European Parliament gave its go-ahead to InvestEU, a new programme set to leverage up to €650 billion of private investments around Europe from 2021 to 2027 [1]. This investment initiative was proposed by the Commission as part of the next EU budget post-2020 and will be the successor of the ‘Juncker Plan’ [2].

The Parliament adopted a mere 40% target for climate-oriented investments under this programme, which does not allow to better align EU finance with the objectives of the Paris Agreement [3]. Still, a higher specific climate target of 65% for investments in infrastructure projects was adopted [4].

On a positive note, the regulation will encourage all projects under Invest EU to undergo sustainability proofing. If well implemented, this measure should ensure that projects with harmful climate, environmental and social impacts are not supported.

And yet, the vote by the Parliament proves incoherent with the EU’s climate commitments, as it falls short of explicitly ensuring genuine alignment with the Paris Agreement. Indeed, the Parliament fails to recognize the role of the energy efficiency first principle, which should be used to channel financing towards demand side projects in the EU.

Under the approved regulation fossil fuel investments – in particular support to gas infrastructure – still remain eligible for public finance, warn CEE Bankwatch Network, Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, WWF European Policy Office, and Counter Balance. Proposals to ban support to fossil fuel projects were repeatedly rejected by several political groups in discussions both at committees and at plenary level.

Xavier Sol, Director at Counter Balance, said:
“The outcome of today’s vote is disappointing since it gives a blank check to future fossil fuels subsidies – especially for gas projects – and contradicts the climate objectives of the European Union. As elected representatives, MEPs should have better integrated the citizens’ concerns on climate in the next EU budget and investment plans.”

Markus Trilling, Finance and Subsidies Policy Coordinator at Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, said:
“Just two months ago the Commission put forward a draft climate long-term strategy and Member States started to discuss the tabled proposal to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. In this context it is economically short-sighted to promote further investments in fossil fuel infrastructure and to put the brakes on clean investments. The upcoming climate proofing mechanism needs to ensure that EU funding fully supports climate objectives.”

Anna Roggenbuck, EIB Policy Officer at CEE Bankwatch Network, said:
“The EU is visibly inconsistent in its approach to climate change mitigation. On the one hand, in June last year, it adopted new, higher renewable energy and energy efficiency targets, but on the other hand it failed to reflect properly these ambitions into its financial tools. The adopted climate target for InvestEU remains on the same level as the one for the Juncker Plan from a few years ago! Without high climate targets in the InvestEU we will not attract private investments to mitigate climate change.”

Arianna Vitali Roscini, Senior Policy Officer for Energy Conservation at WWF European Policy Office, said:
“It is disappointing that Parliament failed to incorporate energy efficiency first as a guiding principle in InvestEU. This could have helped to prioritize investments in projects that save energy in line with the EU’s long-term climate strategy and the massive ensuing health and economic benefits.”


Notes to editors:

[1] InvestEU will be equipped with a €15.2 billion guarantee fund, expected to leverage forty-times this amount in private investments via the European Investment Bank (EIB) and national promotional banks.
[2] The text adopted today by the European Parliament will now be negotiated with the European Council and the European Commission.
[3] The Parliament agreed on a target of 40% for climate investments under InvestEU, which does not go farther than the current climate target under the European Fund for Sustainable Investments,
[4] A specific target of 65% for climate action in the so-called “Sustainable Infrastructure” investment window under InvestEU was agreed by the vote in leading committees, and was maintained despite an offensive by the EPP group to shrink it down to 50%.


Markus Trilling
Finance and Subsidies Policy Coordinator, Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe
markus@caneurope.org , +32 2 8944688

Anna Roggenbuck
EIB Policy Officer, CEE Bankwatch Network, annar@bankwatch.org
Mobile: +48 509970424 Office: +48 91 831 5392

Xavier Sol
Director, Counter Balance, xavier.sol@counter-balance.org
+32 473 223 893

Arianna Vitali Roscini
Senior Policy Officer for Energy Conservation, WWF European Policy Office


Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe is Europe’s leading NGO coalition fighting dangerous climate change. With over 150 member organisations from 35 European countries, representing over 1.700 NGOs and more than 40 million citizens, CAN Europe promotes sustainable climate, energy and development policies throughout Europe.


Press release

Leading Environment and Climate Organisations Score European Parliament’s 2019-2024 Performance ​

New in-depth data research from five leading climate and environment organisations reveals that only a minority of MEPs during the 2019 – 2024 mandate acted to protect Europe’s climate, nature and air quality. The majority of MEPs acted instead as either procrastinators or prehistoric thinkers, delaying real action with patchy and inconsistent voting records, or worse, completely failing to rise to the challenge of the crises Europe is facing.

Read More »